Matrix Elements of Angular Momentum

The concept of angular momentum is perhaps the hardest concept to grasp in the first semester of quantum mechanics. At least for me, putting a hat on the symbol of angular momentum does not help me much to understand it. For those interested, I would refer you to J.J. Sakurai’s chapter on rotation in quantum mechanics to see angular momentum from a different perspective. Regardless of understanding the true physical meaning of angular momentum during the first semester, it is very often that you will be asked on manipulating their commutators and matrix elements. Here I will go over some important aspects of angular momentum.

The Ladder Operators

We define the ladder operators in angular momentum as J±Jx±iJy And specifically, the have the following commutator relations: [J+,J]=2Jz[Jz,J±]=±J±[J2,J±]=0 What do these ladder operators do exactly? Let’s examine their effect on a ket. But before we do that, we need to specify a basis that we will be using. Recall the following relations J2JxJx+JyJy+JzJz and J2 commutes with all Ji's; i.e. [J2,Ji]=0 (*To show this, use the cyclic relations of angular momentum.*) Since J2 and Jz commute, by definition they share an eigenbasis, and hence we define a basis called |a,b, where a is the eigenvalue of J2, and b is the eigenvalue of Jz. Now we can think about what happens when we apply Jz on state J±|a,b.

Jz(J±|a,b)=([Jz,J±]+J±Jz)|a,b=(±J±+J±Jz)|a,b=(±J±)|a,b+bJ±|a,b=(b±)J±|a,b Notice that (b±) is a constant, this means that J±|a,b is still an eigenstate of Jz! But now with eigenvalue shifted by ±. However, J± does not have the “power” to shift the eigenvalues of J2. i.e. J2J±|a,b=J±J2|a,b=aJ±|a,b To summarize: (1)J±|a,b=c±|a,b±

Eigenvalues of J2 and Jz

To obtain the eigenvalues of J2 and Jz, that is, the values for a and b, we can play with the above ladder operators. Many online notes show a clear procedure; I would recommend Griffths, or MIT course notes. For the purpose of context, we will quote the results a=2j(j+1) b=m where we call m the magnetic quantum number sometimes. Similarly, j is the angular momentum quantum number. To put it in a context of chemistry, j is similar to the orbital number l, e.g. for p orbital l=1. It is worth noting that many sources interchange the use of l and j, and sometimes it can get confusing. In my understanding, l is the pure orbital quantum number, and j is used when the spin degrees of freedom arise from the inclusion of electrons. In my notes, I use j throughout to be consistent, but do keep this point in mind in the future. Another result is that if j is an integer, then m must also be integers, and if j is a half-integer, then m must also be half-integers. Specifically, mj,j+1,j+2,,j1,j. Since we have learned that j and m can explicitly specify J2 and Jz's eigenvalues, respectively, then we will now rewrite our basis as |j,m, where we have J2|j,m=j(j+1)2|j,m Jz|j,m=m|j,m

Matrix elements

Assuming |j,m is normalized, we have jm|J2|j,m=j(j+1)2δjjδmm jm|Jz|j,m=mδjjδmm

What about the matrix elements for J±? First note that, J2Jz2=1/2(J+J+JJ+). Then we can write JJ+=2J22Jz2J+J=2Jx2+2Jy2J+J=2Jx2+2Jy22JzJJ+JJ+=Jx2+Jy22Jz=J2Jz2Jz (I used the relation [J+,J]=2Jz from the second line to third)
So now let’s consider j,m|J+J+|j,m=j,m|JJ+|j,m=j,m|J2Jz2Jz|j,m=2(j(j+1)m2m)j,m|j,m=2(j(j+1)m2m) Furthermore, we also know that J+|j,m=c+|j,m+1 must be normalized, and its bra is j,m|J+, so we have j,m|J+J+|j,m=|c+|2=2(j(j+1)m2m)=2(j(j+1)m(m+1))=2(jm)(j+m+1)

We could just take the square root of |c+|2 to get c+; usually, we get a phase factor of expiθ, but it does not affect physical significance, so we just let θ=0, and we arrive at: (2)c+=(jm)(j+m+1) Similarly, (3)c=(j+m)(jm+1) Altogether, (4)jm|J±|j,m=(jm)(j±m+1)δjjδmm+1

A Simple Example of Adding Angular Momentum

Let’s consider 2 electrons in the 1s orbital, so we would not need to consider orbitals degree of freedom here. Here we will also substitute the previous notation of J to S for explicitly showing that we are only talking about spin. In this system, we have a total spin operator: S=s1+s2, which is simply the sum of the individual spin operators of the electrons. The total spin operator satisfies the same rules as the individual spin operators, such as [Sx,Sy]=iSz The relevant eigenvalues are: S2S(S+1)2 Szm s1zm1 s2zm2 The question is, how do we represent our basis so these eigenvalues have corresponding eigenvectors? Previously, we write \ket{j,m}, but that really only applies to one particle. To write a new basis, think of which operators commute? We have two options, S2 and Sz, or s1z and s2z. In fact, both representation works, but often the former representation conveys more information of a total system, whereas the second representation is more of simply combining the pieces of the individual subsystems.

Two representations

i) m1,m2 representation that is based on the eigenkets of s1z and s2z. In case of electrons: m1=±1/2, m2=±1/2. Representing + as +1/2 and as 1/2, we have 4 possible combination: |+,, |+,+, |,+, |,

ii) S,m representation that is based on the eigenkets of S2 and Sz. In our case here, we have possible states: |S=1,m=±1,0, |S=0,m=0. (Recall that m=S,S+1,,S1,S)

To connect the two representations, |S=1,m=1=|+,+, but what is |S=1,m=0? To explicitly obtain the transformation, we would need to apply the ladder operator. Recall that the ladder operator in a combined system is SS1+S2, and we have S|+,+=(S1+S2)|+,+=(a|,++b|+,) (*note that S1 would only apply onto the first system, etc.*)

The coefficients a and b are the same coefficients you would obtain when you apply the ladder operators on eigenstates of the angular momentum… i.e. c=(j+m)(jm+1).

Observe the effect of applying the ladder operator on both sides:
(1+1)(11+1)|S=1,m=0=(1/2+1/2)(1/21/2+1)|,++(1/2+1/2)(1/21/2+1)|+, 2|S=1,m=0=|,++|+, |S=1,m=0=12(|,++|+,) We would then repeat the same procedure to obtain |S=1,m=1=|,
Obviously, as the system gets more complicated, this procedure could get tedious. But the coefficients that connect the two representations above are computed already, and they are called the Clebsh-Gordan coefficients! Essentially, when asked to add angular momentums, it is to represent the S,m representation in terms of the m1,m2, representations.